|
Post by Tim on Aug 30, 2010 9:18:05 GMT -6
Poll closes in 2 days, so let your voice be heard. I'm leaning towards leaving it in as of now, but I can still be persuaded.
|
|
|
Post by alSeen on Aug 30, 2010 13:58:35 GMT -6
i picked yes but not really for that reason. it really just stops people from having "loner" clans, with only them and their 9 alts, not so much fun. but i wouldnt say diverse if everyone is in everyone elses clans lol but i really like the limit since im going to cut my alts (well most of them)
|
|
|
Post by King Richard on Aug 30, 2010 15:58:01 GMT -6
It doesn't bother me either way. I'm gonna try not to use all ten of my alts this time around. Hopefully that way I won't get burned out as fast as v5. The alt limit might actually help me control myself.
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Longshanks on Aug 30, 2010 17:59:54 GMT -6
Definitely yes. Honestly, I'm really bad at maintaining my alts anyway, so this gives me less reason to create characters who will likely end up being abandoned by level 20 anyway. Beyond my own personal reasons though, I think it will vastly improve the game: First, by allowing people to spend more time actually playing their main characters, instead of feeling bound to constantly crank out battles by their armies. Second, because power will no longer be allowed to be concentrated among the few who have more alts (like those of us who are donors), it will encourage newer and more casual players to participate more fully in the game. At least that's what I think.
|
|